Zigbee: a Closer Look

Properties, Advantages, Disadvantages, and Comparison to Wi-Fi

Gerald Senarclens de Grancy

Introduction to Zigbee

The Full-Stack Solution for All Smart Devices

Developed by the Connectivity Standards Alliance (CSA)

  • Low-power, low-cost, and short-range wireless communication technology
  • Common applications: home automation, sensor networks, industrial control

Possible alternative: Matter and Thread

Properties of Zigbee

  • Frequency: 2.4 GHz, 868 MHz, 915 MHz
  • Range: Typically shorter than Wi-Fi
  • Data Rate: Lower than Wi-Fi
  • Topology: Mesh network

Advantages of Zigbee

  • Low power consumption
  • Low cost
  • Reliability
  • Security
  • Does not require a wifi access point

Disadvantages of Zigbee

  • Limited range of individual devices
  • Low data rates
  • Interference
  • Requires a Zigbee coordinator (ZC)

Zigbee Components

Zigbee Coordinator (ZC)

    Role
    Central Hub
    Primary control point for the Zigbee network
    Establishes and maintains the Zigbee mesh network
    Device Management
    Allows adding, removing, and configuring devices on the network
    Security Gateway

    There can be only one coordinator in a Zigbee network

    Usually an inexpensive USB dongle

Zigbee Router (ZR)

Role
Extends network range and improves reliability
Key Functions
  • Base for mesh networking
  • Data relay
  • Route optimization
  • Self-healing capabilities

Most mains-powered Zigbee devices (can) also act as routers

Measured power consumption of an idle Zigbee plug was around 0.3 watt

Zigbee End Device (ZED)

Role
Perform specific tasks within the network
Data reporting to the network
Eg. sensor data acquisition
Power Consumption
Typically battery-powered, emphasizing low power consumption

Examples: temperature sensors, smoke sensors, ...

Zigbee vs. Wi-Fi Comparison

Property Zigbee Wi-Fi
Frequency 2.4 GHz (worldwide)
868 MHz (Europe)
915 MHz (Americas + Australia)
2.4 GHz, 5 GHz
Data Rate Up to 250 kbps Up to several Gbps
Range 10-100 meters (indoor) 30-100 meters (indoor)
Power Consumption Very low (ideal for battery-powered devices)
~0.3W for idle ZR
considerably less for pure ZED
Higher power consumption
~0.5W for idle end device

Summary and Conclusion

  • Low-power, wireless mesh networking protocol ideal for IoT
  • Strong security features and robust mesh topology
  • Applications: smart homes, industrial automation, healthcare
  • Low bandwidth and slower compared to WiFi

The smart home standard Matter combined with the low power IPv6-based mesh networking protocol Thread are an alternative worth considering

Questions
and feedback...